Hazard identification should be performed at what frequency?

• A. Daily
• B. Weekly
• C. Quarterly
• D. Monthly

Answer: (C)

Regular, scheduled hazard identification is key to keeping risk under control. The idea is to re-evaluate hazards at set intervals so changes in procedures, equipment, and conditions are captured and addressed in a timely way. The quarterly cadence strikes a practical balance: it’s frequent enough to detect new or evolving hazards and to verify that corrective actions are working, but not so frequent that the process becomes filler work for the sake of a schedule.

In day-to-day work, hazards should be reported and mitigated as soon as they’re identified, but the formal hazard identification review happens every quarter to refresh the hazard register, reassess risk levels, and track trends and corrective actions. Monthly reviews can be unnecessarily burdensome and may not reveal meaningful shifts quickly enough, while daily or weekly reviews are usually beyond what’s needed for formal hazard identification and can dilute focus from ongoing operations.